The Local Environment

To replace the 2,000 megawatts from Indian Point will require a fleet of new power plants and/or transmission lines strewn throughout the region.

Nuclear is a clean energy source. Replacing the 2,000 megawatts from Indian Point with fossil-fueled plants will dramatically increase emissions into the atmosphere and surrounding environment.

The spent-fuel pools for the two operating Indian Point plants have their own safety and construction features appropriate for protection. They are constructed with concrete walls 4 to 6 feet wide and with a half-inch stainless steel inner liner. They have back up cooling systems with back-up equipment. The spent-fuel pool for Indian Point 1 is in a fully enclosed concrete building.

The roof of the spent-fuel pool building has no nuclear safety function. Damage to it would not have safety consequences.

The fuel pools can easily be re-filled with water.

It is very unlikely there would be significant off-site radiological consequences even if the pools were drained of their water.

The Global Environment

  • According to the U.S. Department of Energy and the Energy Information Administration report Voluntary Reporting of Greenhouse Gases 1997 (published June 1, 1999), the single most effective emission control strategy for utilities was to increase nuclear generation.
  • Nuclear energy accounts for about 72 percent of U.S. emission-free generation in 2000.
  • Total U.S. greenhouse gas emissions increased from the 1990 baseline of 1,641 million metric tons of carbon equivalent to 1,832 tons in 1999.
  • Nuclear generated electricity avoids on average 155 million metric tons of carbon equivalent per year in the U.S. This figure is equal to the amount of reductions needed to achieve the 1990 levels agreed to in the United Nations Climate Change Treaty signed in Rio de Janiero in 1992.
  • Without the emission avoidances from nuclear generation, required reductions in the U.S. would increase by more than 50 percent to achieve targets under the Kyoto Protocol.
    Worldwide nuclear energy avoids on average the emission of 550 million tons of carbon per year.
  • Nuclear generation avoids 2.4 million tons of nitrogen oxide and 5.1 million tons of sulfur dioxide annually in the U.S.
  • Increased nuclear capacity and improved efficiency at nuclear power plants since 1993 represents one-half of voluntary carbon reductions from U.S. industries.
  • In the U.S. Acid Rain program, 21 states showed between 1990-95 a 16.4 percent increase of nuclear generation that avoided 480,000 tons of sulfur dioxide (37 percent of the required emissions reduction). Under the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments, no credit was allocated to the nuclear plants. But, based on the average value of publicly traded sulfur dioxide credits, this contribution would have been worth about $50 million.

NEI's Clean Air Report

BACK TO TOP


TOPICS

The Local Environment

The Global Environment

Green on Energy

I on the Enviroment

Climate Protection Award Winners

   
 
Corporate Profile: Entergy owns, operates and manages nine nuclear generation plants that are among the safest and most professionally operated energy facilities in the United States. Under Entergy's experienced management, several of these plants are rated among the best performing in the nation by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
For more information, visit www.entergy-nuclear.com.

Legal Information - Privacy Policy
© 2002 Entergy Corporation, All Rights Reserved. The Entergy name and logo
are registered service marks of Entergy Corporation and may not be used
without the express, written consent of Entergy Corporation.