|
DAILY NEWS SPECIAL REPORT
TERROR PERIL SEEN AT INDIAN POINT Nuke fallout fears abound
RICHARD T. PIENCIAK DAILY NEWS SENIOR CORRESPONDENT
\02/24/2002
BUCHANAN - The concrete containment domes of the Indian Point
nuclear complex stand tall along the banks of the Hudson River,
just 24 miles from the northern border of the Bronx.
When the two active reactors are working at capacity, they
generate enough electricity to light nearly 2 million homes.
Since the now-closed Unit 1 began operations 40 years ago,
there's been intense debate about whether the plant can run
safely. But the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center
has turbocharged efforts to have the nuclear facility shut.
Federal documents reviewed by the Daily News as well as interviews
with experts suggest that the complex may be more vulnerable
to attack than previously known. In the age of Al Qaeda, these
are the main concerns: The containment domes at Indian Point's
two active reactors were not built to withstand a terrorist
attack by modern-day jumbo jetliners, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission documents show.
The plant's cumbersome four-county evacuation plan is untested
and is the subject of growing derision. Some 20 million people
live within 50 miles of Indian Point, the highest population
density around a nuclear plant in the country.
The three buildings that house 1,500 tons of highly radioactive
spent fuel rods - Unit 1 was shut in 1974 - are nowhere near
as strong as the containment domes - especially the roofs
and exposed sidewalls. NRC documents suggest a severe accident
at one of Indian Point's spent fuel storage buildings - say,
one caused by a terrorist airliner attack - could unleash
a radioactive plume rivaling an aerial release from a reactor
core meltdown.
The two active reactors, now owned by Entergy Corp., have
a long history of safety problems and violations. Unit 2,
bought last year from Consolidated Edison, is the only commercial
nuclear plant in the country to carry a "code red"
safety designation because of "multiple degraded cornerstones."
NRC officials left the red designation in place after a reevaluation
in December. Over the years, Unit 3, bought in 2000 from the
New York Power Authority, also has been cited for numerous
safety violations.
Entergy officials insist the plants are safe and warn that
closing Indian Point, which supplies 7% of the state's power,
could lead to rolling blackouts and price spikes.
Studies show that a shutdown could cause an 8%-to-10% increase
in the cost of electricity to consumers in the peak months
of July and August.
However, replacement power could be purchased from the New
England region, which has a surplus. Some critics say the
Indian Point units could be converted to gas fuel. Also, several
highly efficient gas- fired power plants are slated to come
on line within the state in 2004.
The airplanes that were flown into the World Trade Center
towers on behalf of Osama Bin Laden five months ago could
just as easily have been used to attack Indian Point's Units
2 and 3.
In his State of the Union address, President Bush warned
that the nation's nuclear power plants could be next on Bin
Laden's hit list after he revealed diagrams of American nuke
sites had been discovered by U.S. troops in Afghanistan.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission officials issued an alert
last month warning plant operators that terrorists may be
planning an attack on one or more of their facilities using
hijacked commercial jetliners.
Without providing details, James Kallstrom, a former FBI
official who serves as Gov. Pataki's statewide director of
public security, has assured the public that Indian Point
is secure.
Kallstrom has said his office made 24 specific recommendations
to the NRC and Indian Point operators, most of which were
implemented. On Feb. 14, the NRC issued security regulations,
basically codifying the changes called for by Kallstrom and
his review team.
Still, as Sept. 11 has receded, the official response has
flagged - especially, involving greater protection around
nuclear sites.
No-fly zones imposed by the Federal Aviation Administration
over nuclear reactors were removed in November. Gone, too,
are 24-hour Coast Guard patrols in the Indian Point section
of the Hudson.
Terrorist threat is real
When the Indian Point plants were built, planners did not
consider the possibility of a terrorist attack using a commercial
jetliner. Aircraft then were smaller, lighter and carried
less fuel.
Ed Lyman, scientific director of the Nuclear Control Institute,
a Washington-based group that opposes nuclear arms proliferation,
said the Trade Center attack "was a real eyeopener"
that required "another look at what the worst threat
really is.
"The issue of a jumbo jet loaded with fuel and used
as a weapon is not something that was in any nuclear reactor's
design basis," he said.
According to an NRC report reviewed by The News, half of
today's jumbo jets could penetrate a concrete wall 5 feet
thick. The tops of the containment domes on the two operating
Indian Point reactors are only 3 1/2 feet thick.
Spent fuel rods concern
The vulnerability of the buildings that house more than 30
years of spent fuel rods could pose an even more serious threat.
"They are very susceptible to large planes," said
Mark Jacobs, a co-founder of the Citizens Awareness Network,
a grass-roots organization. "They are not as reinforced
as the containment domes."
Each reactor's control room also is outside the containment
dome, thereby representing another potential "soft target,"
according to Kyle Rabin, policy analyst for the Riverkeeper,
an environmental watchdog organization that has filed a petition
with the NRC seeking an Indian Point shutdown.
David Lochbaum, a nuclear safety engineer with the Union
of Concerned Scientists, told The News that the roofs of the
Indian Point spent fuel buildings contain only 5 to 8 inches
of concrete and that the sidewalls - designed to withstand
a tornado, not an airplane attack - contain about 18 inches
of concrete near the bottom and about 12 inches near the top.
The Indian Point containment domes have not only thicker
tops, but sidewalls that contain up to 6 feet of concrete,
Lochbaum said.
Michael Slobodien, Entergy's director of emergency services,
says the spent fuel storage buildings are relatively small,
largely underground and shielded from a direct aircraft attack
by adjacent structures.
Lochbaum agrees it would be difficult, but not impossible,
for an airplane to strike the storage pools.
"If a plane were to end up in there and cause the water
to drain away, it would have severe consequences because there
is five to six times the amount of radioactive material in
those buildings than in the reactor, and there are fewer barriers
to the outside world," Lochbaum said.
Citing an NRC study, Lochbaum said the death toll from a
successful terrorist attack on an irradiated fuel pool could
be comparable to the fatalities sustained by a major accident
that breached the containment dome.
A worst-case scenario accident at Indian Point, with a meltdown
and complete failure of the containment structure, could lead
to about 50,000 deaths in the first year, according to a study
conducted by the Sandia National Laboratory for the NRC.
The problem of spent fuel storage has been a long-term Achilles'
heel for the nuclear power industry. Deadline after deadline
has passed for the creation of a high-level waste facility
to accommodate used fuel rods from the nation's 103 operating
plants.
Last week, after the United States spent $7 billion on research
during the past 20 years, President Bush recommended that
the Yucca Mountain site in Nevada serve as the nation's first
high-level radioactive waste depository. Nevada officials
have vowed to fight the designation.
Because construction of a national high-level radioactive
waste facility has been delayed for so long, many sites -
especially older ones such as Indian Point - have been forced
to house more spent fuel for longer periods than was envisioned
when the plants were built.
A breach of one of the Indian Point storage buildings could
cut off the water supply to the spent fuel pools, though Entergy
says it has multiple redundant systems in place.
An NRC study says that in a worst-case scenario, the lack
of water could cause a massive fire fueled by the zirconium-alloy
cladding that surrounds the fuel rods. Such a fire could lead
to the disbursal of highly irradiated materials, including
plutonium, one of the most lethal substances known to man.
A spent fuel pool fire also would lead to widespread release
of cesium-137, a radioactive isotope with a half-life of 30
years that contributed to most of the off-site radiation exposure
after the 1986 Chernobyl accident.
Dr. Gordon Thompson, a scientist hired by Riverkeeper, says
NRC studies assume that 100% of the cesium-137 inside a spent
fuel pool would be released into the atmosphere during a pool
fire.
10-mile vs. 50-mile zone
Indian Point critics have taken the opportunity of the increased
post-Sept. 11 focus to draw attention to the 10-mile evacuation
zone around the site, home to 288,000 people in parts of Westchester,
Orange, Rockland and Putnam counties.
"The evacuation plan is not worth the paper it is written
on," said Vincent Tamagna, a member of the Putnam County
Legislature, which has passed a resolution calling for the
plant's shutdown. "No one could demonstrate to me that
it will work."
Riverkeeper's Rabin said it is critical that the zone be
broadened. "There is a gaping hole in the evacuation
plan," he said, "and that is the lack of protection
outside of 10 miles."
Even an NRC document refers to a "peak fatality radius"
of 171/2 miles and "peak injury radius" of 50 miles.
At a three-hour forum on Indian Point safety last Tuesday
at Panas High School in Cortlandt Manor, Fred Schminke of
Continental Village in Putnam County wondered why signs are
not posted along evacuation routes - as they are on hurricane
emergency roads.
Entergy's Slobodien replied that actual evacuation instructions
"would depend on the wind flow."
Holding up a copy of the Westchester County evacuation map,
which contains color-coded routes and evacuation areas, an
exasperated Schminke asked, "In other words, I shouldn't
be using this?"
Slobodien recommended that people "listen to county
officials" on the radio in the event of an accident.
In an interview, Slobodien acknowledged that the evacuation
plan is "clearly a work in progress." He said that
although improvements are constantly being made, the current
plan is adequate to safely evacuate everyone living within
the 10-mile zone.
He also contended that the possibility of a major nuclear
accident is so remote that there is no need to expand the
evacuation zone.
However, that is exactly what a growing number of people
and local officials want: a 50-mile zone that would take in
all of New York City and parts of New Jersey, Connecticut
and Pennsylvania.
"There is absolutely no question that New York City
is in imminent danger should there be any kind of significant
event either from natural disaster, mechanical breakdown or
terrorist attack at Indian Point," said Dr. Irwin Redlener,
president of Children's Hospital at the Montefiore Medical
Center in the Bronx. Redlener also is on four task forces
on disaster preparedness and terrorism.
Elected officials in the four counties covered by the 10-mile
zone recently recertified their localized emergency plans.
Gov. Pataki, who grew up in Peekskill near Indian Point and
still lives within the 10-mile zone, then certified to the
NRC and Federal Emergency Management Agency that the plans
were in order.
In doing so, however, Pataki called on the feds to review
their regulations. "It is pretty much pro forma,"
the governor said. "Do you have the buses in place? Do
you have the sirens in place? That might meet the guidelines
and regulations, but in my view it's not good enough."
Last week, Westchester County announced plans to distribute
potassium iodide to school students in the region as a precautionary
measure and said it may expand the program to all local people.
Potassium iodide can prevent thyroid cancer for some forms
of radiation. It does not, however, protect against cesium-137
and other isotopes.
No longer fringe issue
Maureen Stark of Yorktown Heights celebrated her 43rd birthday
Tuesday at the Cortlandt Manor forum.
The mother of three children ages 14, 11 and 6 says the attention
given to the Indian Point evacuation plan since the twin towers
attacks has made people such as her - "nonpolitical,
nonactivists" - take notice.
She doesn't trust the official evacuation plan and doesn't
intend on following it.
"My kids have a secret plan. They will escape school,
and we will all meet at a designated spot," she said.
"I know at least 20 other families who are going to do
the same thing.
"Sept. 11 has tapped into my maternal instincts,"
Stark said. "My children go to different schools. Under
their plan, in the event of an accident I would have to pick
which child I go to rescue first.
"That's just not right. So from now on, I'm going to
be very involved."
Nearly 300,000 people live within the 10-mile emergency planning
zone for the Indian Point nuclear plant in Buchanan, residing
within portions of Westchester, Putnam, Rockland and Orange
counties.
Some 20 million people live within 50 miles of the site,
including all of New York City, large portions of northern
New Jersey and southern Connecticut plus a tiny portion of
Pennsylvania. Many people want the official 10-mile zone expanded
to 50.
Evacuation plans exist only for those living within 10 miles
of the plant, though a U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
document refers to a "peak fatality radius" of 171/2
miles and "peak injury radius" of 50 miles.
Students would be transported out of the emergency zone on
school buses before any public announcement, to be reunited
with their parents at pre-determined reception centers outside
the evacuation zone.
Not all schools in a particular district are assigned to
the same reception center. That means three children from
the same family could be taken to three different locations.
Evacuation of students, nursing home residents and hospital
patients could take up to 10 hours.
No consideration is given to the possibility that students
would use cell phones to tip off their parents.
Other than threats of arrest, no provisions have been made
for panicked parents who rush to their children's schools
to pick them up.
Bus drivers would be required to make as many as three trips
in and out of the evacuation zone to rescue all of the school
children.
Female drivers of child-bearing age are exempt - that's up
to 60% of the bus drivers in some "emergency response
planning areas."
The plans assume that already overcrowded local roads will
be able to handle maximum traffic flow.
Any plant accident is expected to unfold gradually, with
as much as eight hours of warning. Plans do not consider the
possibility of a terrorist attack, with a sudden release of
a radioactive plume.
The plans assume that no one working at the plant would leak
information about an unfolding accident.
The plans assume that no one residing outside the 10-mile
zone will evacuate. Experience from past disasters shows that
many of those would flee on their own, a phenomenon known
as "shadow evacuation." At Three Mile Island in
1979, the governor issued a voluntary advisory for the evacuation
of 3,400 pregnant women and preschool children living within
5 miles of the plant. Instead, 144,000 people fled, from as
far as 40 miles away.
Entergy's
Response
The Indian Point Energy Center is safe and secure.
Containment structures for the two nuclear reactors have
walls of steel-reinforced concrete several feet thick. Our
engineering judgment is that not even a large aircraft could
penetrate. Storage facilities for used nuclear fuel have walls
6 feet thick of steel-reinforced concrete, are largely underground,
and are shielded by other structures.
An attack on the plant by air or ground is extremely unlikely,
and would be unsuccessful, given enhanced security measures
put in place by Entergy, the military and public safety agencies
since Sept. 11th.
The emergency evacuation plan developed by four counties
near Indian Point is constantly being updated, improved and
kept current with changing conditions. It is intended for
use in any natural or man-made disaster, not just an event
at a nuclear plant.
BACK TO TOP
|