|
News Archive 2002

Against Nukephobia
Reactors
and nuclear waste are perfectly safe from attacks like flying
a plane into them
By LEON JAROFF
America's focus on TERRORISM has breathed new life into the
faltering campaign of anti-nuke activists, whose goal is the
elimination of nuclear power. Many activist groups, such as
the Nuclear Control Institute, Greenpeace and Long Island's
Standing for Truth About Radiation (STAR), in TV interviews
and newspaper ads, have raised the specter of suicide skyjackers
crashing planes into the containment vessels of nuclear plants,
causing disasters that they say would result in hundreds of
thousands of deaths and leave entire regions of the country
uninhabitable for years, if not centuries. Anticipating terrorist
attacks on the spent nuclear fuel rods being shipped to Nevada
for storage, they label these casks "mobile Chernobyls"
containing radioactive material that they insist could kill
tens of thousands. They have gone largely unchallenged-until
now. Writing in the journal Science, 19 members of the National
Academy of Engineering take issue with the activists, declaring.
"Now is the time to clear the air and speak a few simple
scientific and engineering truths."
The engineers, many of them with ties to the nuclear industry,
state flatly that no airplane, regardless of size, can breach
the five-foot-thick, steel-lined concrete walls of a nuclear
plant's containment vessel. They note that in a 1988 crash
test, an unmanned plane flying at 485 mph collapsed against
a steel-reinforced concrete test wall, its fuselage penetrating
less than an inch, its heavy engines digging only an inch
deeper. And what about aircraft the size of those that brought
down the World Trade Center towers? The authors point to analyses
showing that larger, even faster planes can't penetrate the
containment vessels; they fully offset their greater impact
by absorbing more energy during their collapse.
Those mobile Chernobyls? Field tests show, say the engineers,
that there is "virtually nothing" anyone could do
to the "nearly indestructible" casks in which the
spent fuel rods are shipped. They can't explode and there's
no liquid radioactivity to leak out. Only the latest anti-tank
artillery could breach the casks, and even in that worst-case
scenario, say the authors, the radioactive chunks scattered
nearby by those weapons could expose only those in the immediate
vicinity.
The authors also put to rest the "China Syndrome,"
the notion made popular by the Jane Fonda movie of the same
name. It held that a reactor meltdown could cause the superheated
reactor core to melt through the bottom of the vessel and
so far into the earth beneath it that it would eventually
emerge in China. Several tests of the vessel bottom at Three
Mile Island demonstrated that the molten reactor core, weighing
between 10 and 20 metric tons, had penetrated less than a
fifth of an inch into the vessel bottom.
The anti-nuke activists have been wrong for decades. Nuclear
plants have operated in the U.S. for a half century and despite
some poor management, with the exception of Three Mile Island
they have had only minor leaks and mechanical failures. Now
consider this: Three Mile Island was by far the worst U.S.
nuclear accident, and activists for years have been blaming
the partial meltdown for a host of ills, particularly for
what they claim are high cancer rates in the surrounding region.
Pennsylvania health authorities have consistently challenged
those charges and were proven correct in 2000, when the prestigious
University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health completed
a 13-year study of 32,000 people who lived within five miles
of TMI at the time of the accident. The study found no significant
increase in the incidence of any kind of cancer in that group
compared with the incidence in those living at greater distances
from the plant. Indeed, there is no evidence that the TMI
disaster caused any cancer, let alone any death.
The Pittsburgh study reined in some anti-nuke activists,
but the new terrorist threats again has them at full gallop.
Now, they feel, there is even better reason to campaign for
shutting down all U.S. nuclear plants. That plays directly
into the hands of the terrorists. For one thing, this kind
of shutdown would immediately reduce the nation's electric
energy generation by a fifth, and plunge the already battered
U.S. economy into depression. It would also require importing
additional millions of barrels of oil to make up for the energy
shortage. All in all, it would be a bad deal for America.
It's time for the anti-nuke activists to face reality and
to mend their ways.
BACK TO TOP
|